Swe Flagg Swedish

ROBOX™ Products

  
 

Robox Products

ROBOX™.....beyond an analyzer!

 ROBOX™ Production Line Testing

ROBOX™ Car Testing

ROBOX™ Motor Testing

ROBOX™ Cutting Advisor

ROBOX™ SLM Analyser

Product and Services


 
 

Production Line Testing
Your partner for cost effective production line testing

Saving Money: The earlier in the production loop a Roboxfaulty product is found, the better. A major jump in cost is typically associated with the product leaving the factory. After the product is in the hands of the customer, the direct cost, indirect cost and lost customer confidence is very high. As a direct cost, we have the cost for repairing the product at the local service station and/or sending it back for replacement and/or repair. Indirect costs are associated with all the man-power that is included in this process and keeping the systems in order to handle such problems. The cost associated with a customer that is unhappy can be phenomenal and companies have lost their market leadership when failing to handle product line quality assurance. appropriately Proper testing can save substantial money but also give excellent production quality feedback. The system illustrated in Figure 1, performed a 100% on line testing of cars using two microphones and no tachometer, still performing order tracking in real time.

The GO/NO-GO Challenge: The ability to correctly classify a bad component over a good one is not the key challenge in PASS-FAIL testing. The key challenge is to make the yellow zone around the production limit as small as possible – the “faulty zone.” If the system indicates a PASS when it should have indicated a FAIL, a faulty product is being shipped out to a customer. If the system indicates a FAIL when the product should have indicated a PASS, a good product is probably wasted. Usually, the latter is Roboxbetter than the first but that rather depends on the consequences for each “mistake.” On the left side of Figure 2, the classical system approach, using a system that is not able to fully locate the key system parameters for a valid GO/NO-GO testing, is depicted. The section to the right of Figure 2 depicts a system where a more robust method is used. A typical statistical distribution is inserted showing that the better the classification is, the better handling of the faulty products will always become the net result. With a less reliable testing method, it is important to move the distribution curve down and this is often costly.

Robust Testing: When performing successful testing, an understanding of the key parameters that describe the product’s pass/fail state is often needed. After that is accomplished, the proper domain for the analysis is selected. It is, however, very common that multiple domains must be combined. Typically, certain parameters describe correctly, a PASS from a FAIL signal (parameters that are more visual in the proper domain). This is the quality parameter(s) to be quantified. With our patented and award winning system, we have a proven qualification base to work from, plus extensive experience from challenging production testing projects. Multiple scientific papers has been published by our team members and we are always poised to help customers receive efficient but cost effective solutions. With our educational services, training is not an issue and we will rapidly make you more productive.

 









 
| www.acticutinternational.com | www.vibratools.com |